2508.21678v1
Investigating Little Red Dots with UV Excess: Are They the High-Redshift Siblings of Blue Hot DOGs?
Digest
The authors stack NIRCam+MIRI photometry for 326 “V-shape” LRDs (from Akins24 and Kokorev24) and compare their UV–NIR SEDs to median-stacked Blue-excess Hot DOGs (BHDs) to test the analog hypothesis. Despite superficially similar “V-shapes,” LRDs turn over at shorter wavelengths, have much bluer rest-IR continua, show F1800W non-detections in stacks, and require far lower dust attenuation in SED fits—indicating little or no AGN-heated hot dust. They also argue the UV excess in LRDs is unlikely to be scattered AGN light, and note compact morphologies plus lower X-ray detection frequencies. Bottom line: LRDs are not simply high‑z siblings of BHDs, pointing to a distinct early SMBH growth pathway from the super‑Eddington, merger-driven Hot DOG phase.
Key figures to inspect
- Figure 1: Inspect where the LRD “V” turns relative to the Hot DOG envelope; note the very low vs high attenuation AGN templates (A≈0.02 and ≈2.5 mag) needed, and the stacked F1800W upper-limit triangle that underscores the lack of hot-dust emission.
- Figure 2: Compare the observed-frame LRD stacks to BHD templates shifted to z≈6.5 and scaled to typical LRD SMBH masses—predicted F770W–F1800W colors are much redder than the LRD data; check the five MIRI-detected LRD points and the overplotted ‘Virgil’ track to see how genuinely hot-dust systems would appear.
- Figure 3: Examine LRD bolometric luminosity functions versus pre-JWST quasars and the median BHD Lbol marker to assess number-density and luminosity mismatches that argue against a simple BHD analog picture.