2507.04011v1
Investigating the Growth of Little Red Dot Descendants at z<4 with the JWST
Digest
Using CEERS imaging, the authors select z<4 “post-LRD” candidates by requiring a compact, very red core plus a blue star-forming envelope, then model inner/outskirts with stellar-only SED fits and single-Sérsic morphologies. The sample shows LRD-like cores with M* ~1e10 Msun, Σ* ~1e11 Msun kpc^-2, and compact sizes about 1 kpc below the size–mass relation, while adding an extended young component; their number density at z=3±0.5 (~10^-4.15 Mpc^-3) matches that of LRDs at 5<z<7, indicating an evolutionary link. Outskirts mass fraction and size increase toward lower redshift (≈250 pc at z=5 to ≈600 pc at z=3), as the core stays red/compact and the hallmark V-shaped SED fades, consistent with growth by cold accretion. This offers an explanation for the apparent decline of LRD counts at lower z, with the caveat that it assumes a single evolutionary path and stellar-only modeling.
Key figures to inspect
- Figure 1: Inspect where the color–magnitude–selected post-LRDs fall relative to the CEERS locus and the F277W–F444W > 1.5 LRD red-core cut; verify that selected sources are LRD-red in the core while permitting blue outskirts.
- Figure 2: Check the segmentation/ellipse defining inner vs outskirts and compare to the F444W PSF circle to confirm the red core is resolved and the blue envelope extends beyond the beam.
- Figure 3: Examine the redshift distribution and the six objects overlapping the Kocevski et al. (2025) LRD sample; use this to contextualize the z=3±0.5 bin used for the number-density comparison.
- Figure 4: Use the mock-injection errors vs half-light radius and Sérsic n, along with the F444W HWHM and adopted resolution limit, to gauge the robustness of compactness claims and any size floor biases.