2510.07303v1
Confirming Near- to Mid-IR Photometrically-Identified Obscured AGNs in the JWST era
First listed 2025-10-08 | Last updated 2025-10-08
Abstract
We evaluate the underlying assumptions for the identification of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) through near- and mid-infrared photometry and spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting out to z ~ 3. For massive galaxies, log(M) > 9.5, our high resolution spectra of the rest optical range generally confirm the results of SED fitting, which relies primarily on excesses above the stellar emission between 1 and 6 microns to identify AGN. However, the method is undermined if the redshift used for the SED fitting is incorrect. Low mass galaxies, log(M) < 9:5, can contain relatively warm dust that emits in the 4 - 6 micron range. We show that the potential contamination of AGN samples by purely star forming low-mass galaxies can be avoided by the use of the infrared properties of Haro 11 as a limiting star-forming SED template. However, relatively few star forming galaxies emit as strongly in the 3 - 6 micron range as this template, so this could result in missing some obscured AGNs to avoid a minor contamination. Including the behavior of the galaxies at rest lamda ~ 13.5 microns can mitigate this problem and yield more complete samples of bona fide AGN. JWST/MIRI supports this approach out to z ~ 0.6.
Short digest
Tests how well near–mid-IR photometric SED fitting picks out obscured AGN by comparing to JWST/NIRSpec MSA rest‑optical spectra for 17 MIRI‑selected candidates at z=1.24–3.33, and by auditing low‑mass interlopers. For massive hosts (log M*>9.5), the spectra and BPT diagnostics generally back the 1–6 μm excess criterion, with several sources showing outflow‑broadened [O III]/Balmer lines. Low‑mass galaxies can mimic a 4–6 μm AGN excess via warm dust; adopting Haro 11 as a limiting star‑forming SED curbs contamination but can miss some obscured AGN. Adding rest λ≈13.5 μm behavior restores completeness, feasible with MIRI out to z≈0.6, while emphasizing that wrong redshifts can undermine SED‑based IDs.
Key figures to inspect
- Figure 1 (BPT placement): Check where the 17 MIRI‑selected candidates land relative to Kewley/Kauffmann lines to see spectroscopic confirmation of obscuration and which lie in star‑forming vs AGN zones.
- Figure 1 (example spectra A=87191, B=209962, C=196290): Inspect [O III] and Balmer line widths to separate outflow‑broadened narrow lines from genuine broad‑line components and link to the obscuration implied by the SEDs.
- Figure 2 (SED decompositions): Verify that the AGN component is required by the 1–6 μm excess across acceptable fits, note how redshift shifts PAH features and drives degeneracy, and check how adding rest ~13.5 μm constrains the solution.
- Figure 2 (continued panels): Compare massive vs dwarf hosts to see when a warm, non‑PAH stellar IR excess can masquerade as AGN and how the fit partitions flux among stellar, hot‑dust (star‑forming), and AGN components.
- Figure 4 (WISE colors of dwarfs): Gauge how local low‑metallicity dwarfs intrude into AGN color wedges, and use Haro 11’s track as a conservative boundary to balance completeness vs contamination.
Discussion
Log in to view the paper discussion, see votes, and leave your own feedback.